How Do Fast Fashion’s ESG Accounts Add Up? The Financial and Carbon Logic Behind Double 11 Shopping Festival - Article

1.The Cost of the Double 11 Frenzy: Carbon Emissions and Waste Behind Every Second of Checkout

The Double 11 shopping festival has become the annual sales peak for brands and e-commerce platforms. Yet behind the surge in traffic and transactions lies an enormous carbon footprint and resource waste.
According to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the fashion industry accounts for about 10% of global carbon emissions, and 20% of industrial wastewater comes from textile production. The short-term sales push driven by fast fashion marketing encourages a “produce in bulk, then discount aggressively” cycle, creating severe inventory pressure and high disposal rates. This not only undermines financial soundness but also heightens corporate risks in ESG ratings, particularly in “resource efficiency” and “waste management.

2. The Externalization of Fast Fashion’s Costs: From Inventory Pressure to Hidden Carbon Costs

2.1 The Carbon Footprint Challenge of Unsold Goods

According to a BCG report, nearly 30% of apparel items ultimately remain unsold, ending up either incinerated or liquidated at steep discounts. These “unsold emissions” represent a hidden but tangible ESG cost, one that traditional financial reporting standards struggle to fully capture. For instance, if one garment generates 8 kg of CO₂e from raw materials through logistics, should the company still be held accountable for those emissions if the item is discarded? At present, most firms classify this as “inventory loss,” without making a corresponding disclosure or provision for its carbon footprint.

2.2 Impact on Cash Flow and ESG Ratings

Inventory pressure also results in capital lock-in and lower ESG scores. For example, when S&P Global evaluates apparel brands, it includes “inventory turnover” as part of its resource efficiency metrics. If turnover is poor and write-offs are high, even the most polished sustainability report cannot prevent a decline in ESG performance.

Image source: FREEPIK

3. How Are Emissions Calculated? The Scope 3 Challenge in Fast Fashion

3.1 Definitions of the Three Scopes

According to the GHG Protocol, corporate carbon emissions are categorized into three scopes:

Scope 1: Direct emissions from owned equipment or facilities
Scope 2: Indirect emissions from purchased electricity
Scope 3: Indirect emissions across the value chain, including suppliers, logistics, product use, and disposal

3.2 The Scope 3 Challenge for Fast Fashion

For fast fashion, Scope 3 accounts for 80–90% of total emissions, yet it is also the most difficult to quantify and control. For example:

A single jacket involves multiple supply chains and regions across its lifecycle—from cotton cultivation, dyeing and finishing, manufacturing, transportation, and retail to disposal
When brands cannot obtain primary data from suppliers, they must rely on emission factors for estimation, which reduces accuracy
Return rates and disposal methods (e.g., incineration, landfill) must also be factored into emission calculations

All of this signals a warning: once carbon emissions become the basis for financing and taxation, the verifiability and compliance of data will directly affect financial reporting and investor communication.

Image source: FREEPIK

4. Case Analysis: How H&M and Uniqlo Disclose ESG and Carbon Risks

4.1 H&M: Linking Data Management with Incentive Mechanisms

In its 2023 Sustainability Report, H&M disclosed that 98% of its total carbon emissions come from Scope 3. To address this, the company has:

Required suppliers to adopt standardized carbon accounting tools (e.g., Higg Index)
Established auditable carbon data processes and verification systems
Integrated ESG emission reduction and the share of sustainable materials into performance and incentive KPIs

4.2 Uniqlo: Recycling + Financial Disclosure

Fast Retailing has adopted Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to strengthen its sustainability approach:

Re-manufacturing products such as down jackets and jeans to reduce carbon footprints
Including ESG-related expenditures and investment projects in financial statement notes, while gradually aligning with the ISSB framework

5. How Should Taiwanese Companies Keep Up? Four Strategic Recommendations

1.Adopt International Carbon Footprint Tools
Implement product carbon footprint methodologies such as ISO 14067 or the GHG Protocol to establish carbon accounting logic and calculation processes.
Create an Auditable Ledger for Sustainability Expenditures
Classify expenditures by nature—such as sustainable equipment, raw materials, certifications, and capitalizable items—to facilitate accounting and auditing.
Upgrade ERP/Carbon Accounting Modules
Integrate carbon emission data into procurement, inventory, disposal, and financial processes, achieving ESG financial governance that unifies “carbon and capital.
Establish an ESG Finance Task Force
Form a cross-functional team to coordinate estimation and disclosure policies across finance, sustainability, and operations.

Image source: FREEPIK

6. Conclusion: Fast Fashion Must Not Only Look Good, but Also Account Clearly

Fast fashion now stands at a crossroads of transformation. While Double 11 represents a peak in consumer demand, it also exposes vulnerabilities in sustainability and financial management. Governments, investors, and consumers alike are demanding greater ESG disclosures—not just marketing slogans.
If accounting and finance departments can plan ahead—ensuring consistency from carbon inventories to accounting provisions—there is an opportunity to turn ESG costs into governance assets, thereby strengthening corporate competitiveness.

Is your company ready to meet the new ESG challenges?

Fill out the ESG Financial Diagnostic Form to quickly understand your company's current ESG financial standing and receive tailored recommendations.

Hall Chadwick Taiwan has extensive experience in ESG financial consulting and can assist your company in building a sustainability reporting framework that aligns with the latest regulatory requirements.
If you have any questions regarding the 2025 ESG financial disclosure requirements, feel free to contact us.